Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Apr 26 2023 - 10:22:01 EST

Next message: Liang, Kan: "Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush the PEBS buffer in PEBS enable"
Previous message: Fabrizio Castro: "RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: r9a06g032-sysctrl: Change maintainer to Fabrizio Castro"
In reply to: Joel Fernandes: "Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail"
Next in thread: Michael Ellerman: "Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:44:22AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:

> How could you control which code paths don't have the stack protector?
> Just curious.

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412-no_stackp-v2-0-116f9fe4bbe7@xxxxxxxxxx

Next message: Liang, Kan: "Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush the PEBS buffer in PEBS enable"
Previous message: Fabrizio Castro: "RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: r9a06g032-sysctrl: Change maintainer to Fabrizio Castro"
In reply to: Joel Fernandes: "Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail"
Next in thread: Michael Ellerman: "Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]