Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional compilation

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:37:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Personally I would go for [0] as the least invasive solution, but I really
> have no idea, sorry. I just hope that your (broken) patch doesn't make it
> as-is into the upstream kernel.

I've applied the SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS patch which seems to fix the issue
for riscv.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature