Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] kunit: Deferred action helpers

From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Tue Apr 25 2023 - 11:24:04 EST


Hi,

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 04:42:23PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> This is v1 of the KUnit deferred actions API, which implements an
> equivalent of devm_add_action[1] on top of KUnit managed resources. This
> provides a simple way of scheduling a function to run when the test
> terminates (whether successfully, or with an error). It's therefore very
> useful for freeing resources, or otherwise cleaning up.
>
> The notable changes since RFCv2[2] are:
> - Got rid of the 'cancellation token' concept. It was overcomplicated,
> and we can add it back if we need to.
> - kunit_add_action() therefore now returns 0 on success, and an error
> otherwise (like devm_add_action()). Though you may wish to use:
> - Added kunit_add_action_or_reset(), which will call the deferred
> function if an error occurs. (See devm_add_action_or_reset()). This
> also returns an error on failure, which can be asserted safely.
> - Got rid of the function pointer typedef. Personally, I liked it, but
> it's more typedef-y than most kernel code.
> - Got rid of the 'internal_gfp' argument: all internal state is now
> allocated with GFP_KERNEL. The main KUnit resource API can be used
> instead if this doesn't work for your use-case.
>
> I'd love to hear any further thoughts!

I've converted the KMS kunit tests to use that API when relevant, and
it works like a charm and is super usable, thanks so much.

One improvement we could do as a second step is to provide a
kunit_action_t type or something to make casting kfree-like functions
easier, but it's already great overall.

Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks again,
Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature