Re: [PATCH tracing 0/3] tracing: support > 8 byte filter predicates

From: Google
Date: Tue Apr 25 2023 - 10:32:43 EST


On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 10:16:34 +0100
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> For cases like IPv6 addresses, having a means to supply tracing
> predicates for fields with more than 8 bytes would be convenient.
> This series provides a simple way to support this by allowing
> simple ==, != memory comparison with the predicate supplied when
> the size of the field exceeds 8 bytes. For example, to trace
> ::1, the predicate
>
> "dst == 0x00000000000000000000000000000001"
>
> ..could be used.

Nice!
And I also would like to use something like "dst == ipv6(::1)" because
it seems easy to make a mistake on the number of zeros.

Can we add such type casting feature to the filter?

Thank you,

>
> Patch 1 provides the support for > 8 byte fields via a memcmp()-style
> predicate. Patch 2 adds tests for filter predicates, and patch 3
> documents the fact that for > 8 bytes. only == and != are supported.
>
> Changes since RFC [1]:
>
> - originally a fix was intermixed with the new functionality as
> patch 1 in series [1]; the fix landed separately
> - small tweaks to how filter predicates are defined via fn_num as
> opposed to via fn directly
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1659910883-18223-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Alan Maguire (3):
> tracing: support > 8 byte array filter predicates
> selftests/ftrace: add test coverage for filter predicates
> tracing: document > 8 byte numeric filtering support
>
> Documentation/trace/events.rst | 9 +++
> kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 55 +++++++++++++++-
> .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/filter.tc | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/filter.tc
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>


--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>