Re: [PATCH 22/22] workqueue: Don't implicitly make UNBOUND workqueues w/ @max_active==1 ordered

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 04:50:46PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There aren't that many UNBOUND w/ @max_active==1 users in the tree and the
> preceding patches audited all and converted them to
> alloc_ordered_workqueue() as appropriate. This patch removes the implicit
> promotion of UNBOUND w/ @max_active==1 workqueues to ordered ones.

And because you only Cc'ed me on this patch but not the rest of the
series there is no way to make me see it.  Either cc me everywhere
because it's actually important, or preferably just drop fringe Ccs.