Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: simple: add support for InnoLux G070ACE-L01

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Apr 21 2023 - 12:45:48 EST


On 21/04/2023 18:37, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 21/04/2023 18:15, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:51 AM <richard.leitner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Add Innolux G070ACE-L01 7" WVGA (800x480) TFT LCD panel compatible
>>>> string.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> nit: as I understand it, ordering of tags is usually supposed to be
>>> chronological. You signed off on this patch before Krzysztof acked it,
>>> so the SoB should be above. I'll fix that when applying.
>>
>> Some people agree with this... but b4 disagrees, so I would say the
>> tools should implement the right process and right decisions. We should
>> not be correcting the tools' output, unless the tools are not correct -
>> then fix the tools.
>
> Ah, interesting. I checked and as far as I could tell Richard had
> manually added the tag when sending v2, so I didn't assume it as a
> tool-added tag. I'm happy to let "b4" be the canonical thing that says
> what the order should be.
>
> OK, so I just tried this and I'm confused. I ran:
>
> b4 am -P_ 20230201-innolux-g070ace-v2-2-2371e251dd40@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ...and when I check the patch that b4 spits out my "Reviewed-by" tag
> is _after_ the "Signed-off-by" tag, just like I asked for.
>
> Just in case Acked-by was somehow different than Reviewed-by, I went
> back to the original version where you added the Acked-by:
>
> b4 am -P_ 20221118075856.401373-1-richard.leitner@xxxxxxxxx
>
> ...and, again, it matches the order that I thought was right. In other
> words, the patch file generated says:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>

We talk about `b4 trailers`, because the tag is applied by the
submitter, not by the maintainer.

>
> Did I get something wrong in the above?

Your `b4 am` will of course put the tag later, because it is you who
applies the tag.

Best regards,
Krzysztof