Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnessary comment in __may_age_extent_tree
From: Chao Yu
Date: Thu Apr 20 2023 - 22:27:49 EST
On 2023/4/18 14:09, Qi Han wrote:
This comment make no sense and is in the wrong place, so let's
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Qi Han <hanqi@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 28b12553f2b3..1f6d7de35794 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static bool __may_age_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
if (!test_opt(sbi, AGE_EXTENT_CACHE))
return false;
- /* don't cache block age info for cold file */
if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_COMPRESSED_FILE))
return false;
Should move it here instead of removal?
/* don't cache block age info for cold file */
if (file_is_cold(inode))