Re: [PATCH 02/10] crypto: ccp: Add support for displaying PSP firmware versions

From: Tom Lendacky
Date: Thu Apr 20 2023 - 15:17:21 EST


On 4/20/23 11:31, Mario Limonciello wrote:
As it's not always obvious what PSP bootloader or TEE version are
present in OEM systems, add the ability to get this information from
sysfs for supported platforms.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ccp | 18 +++++++
drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h | 2 +
drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ccp b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ccp
index 7aded9b75553..ee6b787eee7a 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ccp
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ccp
@@ -85,3 +85,21 @@ Description:
Possible values:
0: Not enforced
1: Enforced
+
+What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/<BDF>/bootloader_version
+Date: June 2023
+KernelVersion: 6.4
+Contact: mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx
+Description:
+ The /sys/bus/pci/devices/<BDF>/bootloader_version
+ file reports the firmware version of the AMD AGESA
+ bootloader.
+
+What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/<BDF>/tee_version
+Date: June 2023
+KernelVersion: 6.4
+Contact: mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx
+Description:
+ The /sys/bus/pci/devices/<BDF>/tee_version
+ file reports the firmware version of the AMD Trusted
+ Execution Environment (TEE).
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h
index 1253a0217985..76c32ee6bd65 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct tee_vdata {
const unsigned int cmdbuff_addr_hi_reg;
const unsigned int ring_wptr_reg;
const unsigned int ring_rptr_reg;
+ const unsigned int info_reg;
};
struct platform_access_vdata {
@@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ struct psp_vdata {
const unsigned int feature_reg;
const unsigned int inten_reg;
const unsigned int intsts_reg;
+ const unsigned int bootloader_info_reg;
};
/* Structure to hold SP device data */
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
index 85e3dc8853e2..4d729aa1b260 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
* Author: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@xxxxxxx>
*/
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
@@ -88,8 +89,65 @@ static struct attribute_group psp_security_attr_group = {
.is_visible = psp_security_is_visible,
};
+#define version_attribute_show(name, _offset) \
+static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr, \
+ char *buf) \
+{ \
+ struct sp_device *sp = dev_get_drvdata(d); \
+ struct psp_device *psp = sp->psp_data; \
+ unsigned int val = ioread32(psp->io_regs + _offset); \
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%02lx.%02lx.%02lx.%02lx\n", \
+ FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 24), val), \
+ FIELD_GET(GENMASK(23, 16), val), \
+ FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 8), val), \
+ FIELD_GET(GENMASK(7, 0), val)); \
+}
+
+version_attribute_show(bootloader_version, psp->vdata->bootloader_info_reg)
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(bootloader_version);
+version_attribute_show(tee_version, psp->vdata->tee->info_reg)
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(tee_version);
+
+static struct attribute *psp_firmware_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_bootloader_version.attr,
+ &dev_attr_tee_version.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static umode_t psp_firmware_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int idx)
+{
+ struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+ struct sp_device *sp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct psp_device *psp = sp->psp_data;
+ unsigned int val = 0xffffffff;
+
+ if (!psp)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_bootloader_version.attr &&
+ psp->vdata->bootloader_info_reg)
+ val = ioread32(psp->io_regs + psp->vdata->bootloader_info_reg);
+
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_tee_version.attr &&
+ psp->capability & PSP_CAPABILITY_TEE &&
+ psp->vdata->tee->info_reg)
+ val = ioread32(psp->io_regs + psp->vdata->tee->info_reg);
+
+

Extra blank line.

Also, add a comment about how the PSP security policy might block access to these areas resulting in reading all f's, so this hides the sysfs attribute in that case.

Thanks,
Tom

+ if (val != 0xffffffff)
+ return 0444;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct attribute_group psp_firmware_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = psp_firmware_attrs,
+ .is_visible = psp_firmware_is_visible,
+};
+
static const struct attribute_group *psp_groups[] = {
&psp_security_attr_group,
+ &psp_firmware_attr_group,
NULL,
};