Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: allocate folios according to the blocksize

[Pankaj Raghav]

On 2023-04-20 14:19, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
>> **Questions on the future work**:
>>
>> As willy pointed out, we have to do this `order = mapping->host->i_blkbits - PAGE_SHIFT` in
>> many places. Should we pursue something that willy suggested: encapsulating order in the
>> mapping->flags as a next step?[1]
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZDty+PQfHkrGBojn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Well ... really, not sure.
> Yes, continue updating buffer_heads would be a logical thing as it could be done incrementally.
>
> But really, the end-goal should be to move away from buffer_heads for fs and mm usage. So I wonder
> if we shouldn't rather look in that direction..
>
Yeah, I understand that part. Hopefully, this will be discussed as a part of LSFMM.

But the changes that are done in filemap and readahead needs to be done anyway irrespective of the
underlying aops right? Or Am I missing something.

> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes
>