Re: [PATCH v5] drm/fbdev-generic: prohibit potential out-of-bounds access

From: Sui Jingfeng
Date: Thu Apr 20 2023 - 06:27:58 EST


Hi,

On 2023/4/20 15:04, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,

this patch looks to me good and I'd like to merge it, if no one objects.

In the near future, after i915 has switched to struct drm_client, I intend to move DRM's deferred-I/O helpers into fbdev-generic and i915.


That sound fine,  I can help to test then.

But I think,  it may better to make it a 100% DRM function?


Those are the two users, but they are fairly different. They can then both have something tailored towards their needs.

Best regards
Thomas

Am 20.04.23 um 05:05 schrieb Sui Jingfeng:
The fbdev test of IGT may write after EOF, which lead to out-of-bound
access for drm drivers hire fbdev-generic. For example, run fbdev test
on a x86+ast2400 platform, with 1680x1050 resolution, will cause the
linux kernel hang with the following call trace:

   Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
   [IGT] fbdev: starting subtest eof
   Workqueue: events drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
   [IGT] fbdev: starting subtest nullptr

   RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0xa/0x20
   RSP: 0018:ffffa17d40167d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
   RAX: ffffa17d4eb7fa80 RBX: ffffa17d40e0aa80 RCX: 00000000000014c0
   RDX: 0000000000001a40 RSI: ffffa17d40e0b000 RDI: ffffa17d4eb80000
   RBP: ffffa17d40167e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff89522ecff8c0
   R10: ffffa17d4e4c5000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa17d4eb7fa80
   R13: 0000000000001a40 R14: 000000000000041a R15: ffffa17d40167e30
   FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff895257380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
   CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
   CR2: ffffa17d40e0b000 CR3: 00000001eaeca006 CR4: 00000000001706e0
   Call Trace:
    <TASK>
    ? drm_fbdev_generic_helper_fb_dirty+0x207/0x330 [drm_kms_helper]
    drm_fb_helper_damage_work+0x8f/0x170 [drm_kms_helper]
    process_one_work+0x21f/0x430
    worker_thread+0x4e/0x3c0
    ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
    kthread+0xf4/0x120
    ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
    ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
    </TASK>
   CR2: ffffa17d40e0b000
   ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

The is because damage rectangles computed by
drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip() function does not guaranteed to be
bound in the screen's active display area. Possible reasons are:

1) Buffers are allocated in the granularity of page size, for mmap system
    call support. The shadow screen buffer consumed by fbdev emulation may
    also choosed be page size aligned.

2) The DIV_ROUND_UP() used in drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip()
    will introduce off-by-one error.

For example, on a 16KB page size system, in order to store a 1920x1080
XRGB framebuffer, we need allocate 507 pages. Unfortunately, the size
1920*1080*4 can not be divided exactly by 16KB.

  1920 * 1080 * 4 = 8294400 bytes
  506 * 16 * 1024 = 8290304 bytes
  507 * 16 * 1024 = 8306688 bytes

  line_length = 1920*4 = 7680 bytes

  507 * 16 * 1024 / 7680 = 1081.6

  off / line_length = 507 * 16 * 1024 / 7680 = 1081
  DIV_ROUND_UP(507 * 16 * 1024, 7680) will yeild 1082

memcpy_toio() typically issue the copy line by line, when copy the last
line, out-of-bound access will be happen. Because:

  1082 * line_length = 1082 * 7680 = 8309760, and 8309760 > 8306688

Note that userspace may stil write to the invisiable area if a larger
buffer than width x stride is exposed. But it is not a big issue as
long as there still have memory resolve the access if not drafting so
far.

  - Also limit the y1 (Daniel)
  - keep fix patch it to minimal (Daniel)
  - screen_size is page size aligned because of it need mmap (Thomas)
  - Adding fixes tag (Thomas)

Fixes: aa15c677cc34 ("drm/fb-helper: Fix vertical damage clipping")

Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/ad44df29-3241-0d9e-e708-b0338bf3c623@xxxxxx/
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
index 64458982be40..6bb1b8b27d7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
@@ -641,19 +641,27 @@ static void drm_fb_helper_damage(struct drm_fb_helper *helper, u32 x, u32 y,
  static void drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len,
                             struct drm_rect *clip)
  {
+    u32 line_length = info->fix.line_length;
+    u32 fb_height = info->var.yres;
      off_t end = off + len;
      u32 x1 = 0;
-    u32 y1 = off / info->fix.line_length;
+    u32 y1 = off / line_length;
      u32 x2 = info->var.xres;
-    u32 y2 = DIV_ROUND_UP(end, info->fix.line_length);
+    u32 y2 = DIV_ROUND_UP(end, line_length);
+
+    /* Don't allow any of them beyond the bottom bound of display area */
+    if (y1 > fb_height)
+        y1 = fb_height;
+    if (y2 > fb_height)
+        y2 = fb_height;
        if ((y2 - y1) == 1) {
          /*
           * We've only written to a single scanline. Try to reduce
           * the number of horizontal pixels that need an update.
           */
-        off_t bit_off = (off % info->fix.line_length) * 8;
-        off_t bit_end = (end % info->fix.line_length) * 8;
+        off_t bit_off = (off % line_length) * 8;
+        off_t bit_end = (end % line_length) * 8;
            x1 = bit_off / info->var.bits_per_pixel;
          x2 = DIV_ROUND_UP(bit_end, info->var.bits_per_pixel);