Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: mediatek: Add support for MT7981

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Thu Apr 20 2023 - 03:47:42 EST


Il 19/04/23 21:25, Daniel Golle ha scritto:
The PWM unit on MT7981 uses different register offsets than previous
MediaTek PWM units. Add support for these new offsets and add support
for PWM on MT7981 which has 3 PWM channels, one of them is typically
used for a temperature controlled fan.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index 5b5eeaff35da6..2bfb5bedf570b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -34,10 +34,14 @@
#define PWM_CLK_DIV_MAX 7
+#define REG_V1 1
+#define REG_V2 2
+
struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
unsigned int num_pwms;
bool pwm45_fixup;
bool has_ck_26m_sel;
+ u8 reg_ver;

You're overcomplicating this one... checking for a register version and then
deciding at every pwm_mediatek_writel() call what to use...

It's way simpler than that!
Pass a pointer to the register array in pwm_mediatek_of_data and then...

};
/**
@@ -59,10 +63,14 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
const struct pwm_mediatek_of_data *soc;
};
-static const unsigned int pwm_mediatek_reg_offset[] = {
+static const unsigned int mtk_pwm_reg_offset_v1[] = {
0x0010, 0x0050, 0x0090, 0x00d0, 0x0110, 0x0150, 0x0190, 0x0220
};
+static const unsigned int mtk_pwm_reg_offset_v2[] = {
+ 0x0080, 0x00c0, 0x0100, 0x0140, 0x0180, 0x1c0, 0x200, 0x0240
+};
+
static inline struct pwm_mediatek_chip *
to_pwm_mediatek_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
@@ -111,7 +119,19 @@ static inline void pwm_mediatek_writel(struct pwm_mediatek_chip *chip,
unsigned int num, unsigned int offset,
u32 value)
{
- writel(value, chip->regs + pwm_mediatek_reg_offset[num] + offset);

...this simply becomes:

writel(value, chip->regs + chip->reg_offset[num] + offset);

+ u32 pwm_offset;
+
+ switch (chip->soc->reg_ver) {
+ case REG_V2:
+ pwm_offset = mtk_pwm_reg_offset_v2[num];
+ break;
+
+ case REG_V1:
+ default:
+ pwm_offset = mtk_pwm_reg_offset_v1[num];
+ }
+
+ writel(value, chip->regs + pwm_offset + offset);
}
static int pwm_mediatek_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
@@ -285,60 +305,77 @@ static const struct pwm_mediatek_of_data mt2712_pwm_data = {
.num_pwms = 8,
.pwm45_fixup = false,
.has_ck_26m_sel = false,
+ .reg_ver = REG_V1,

...so instead of assigning that, you'd be assigning

.reg_offset = mtk_pwm_reg_offset_v1;

Better, right? :-)

Cheers,
Angelo