Re: [regression] Bug 216946 - Toshiba satellite click mini l9w-b: touchscreen: no touch events with kernel 6.1.4

[Gé Koerkamp]

Hi Thorsten,

travelling at the moment, but I’ll try. Not really into bisecting kernel issues, but let’s see where this goes. Another issue is, that I don’t have a Toshiba Mini Click myself, so I need to build the test Volumio images (volumio.org) with the different 5.16-rc kernel patch versions for a colleague to work with, hopefully  he has time to do this.

Thanks - Gé

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Apr 2023, at 13:55, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 01.03.23 12:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 2/28/23 14:26, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:32 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
>>> <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 19.01.23 16:06, Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
>>>>> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
>>>>> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216946 :
>>>> 
>>>> The reporter recently confirmed in the ticket that the issue still
>>>> happens with 6.2.
>>>> 
>>>> There wasn't any reply from any of the input developers here or in
>>>> bugzilla afaics. :-/ Hmmm. Could someone from that camp maybe please
>>>> take a minute and at least briefly look into this as answer something
>>>> like "that might be due to a problem in subsystem 'foo'", "maybe ask bar
>>>> for an option", or "we have no idea what might cause this, this needs to
>>>> be bisected"? That would help a lot.
>>> 
>>> The working dmesg shows a line with:
>>> hid-generic 0018:0457:10FB.0002: input,hidraw1: I2C HID v1.00 Device
>>> [SIS0817:00 0457:10FB] on i2c-SIS0817:00
>>> and then
>>> hid-multitouch 0018:0457:10FB.0002: input,hidraw1: I2C HID v1.00
>>> Device [SIS0817:00 0457:10FB] on i2c-SIS0817:00
>>> 
>>> But these 2 lines do not appear on the 6.1.4 logs.
>>> 
>>> So the device is not properly enumerated by ACPI or I2C. Hans might
>>> have an idea on how to debug/solve that issue.
>> 
>> I actually have a Toshiba satellite click mini l9w-b lying around
>> myself. I already made a note to try and reproduce this
>> 
>> But I'm very much swamped with too much kernel work, so no promises
>> when I will get around to this ...
> 
> Has anyone made any progress with this? Doesn't look like it, hence I
> wondered if this fall through the cracks; but maybe I'm just missing
> something.
> 
> Gé Koerkamp: with a bit of luck Hans sooner or later will have time to
> look into this, but it might speed things up if you could try to bisect
> this.
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
> 
> #regzbot poke
> 
>>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>>>> --
>>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>>> 
>>>> #regzbot poke
>>>>>> Gé Koerkamp 2023-01-17 20:21:51 UTC
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Created attachment 303619 [details]
>>>>>> Kernel configuration for v6.1.4/ journalctl (dmesg)/ ACPIdump/lsmod
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Overview:
>>>>>> The touchscreen does not react on touch events.
>>>>>> Touchscreen display and touchpad are working.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Step to reproduce:
>>>>>> Open any UI page
>>>>>> Try to use touch on relevant UI controls (buttons etc.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Result:
>>>>>> No reaction on screen touches
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Expected result:
>>>>>> Reaction on touched control, same as when using the touch pad or connected mouse (which do work).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Build information:
>>>>>> The error happens with kernel version 6.1.4
>>>>>> After rebuilding with different kernel versions, it appears that it first fails with kernel 5.16
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Additional builds:
>>>>>> The click mini l9w-b still works with kernel 5.10.y LTS and 5.15.y LTS.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Important remark:
>>>>>> Touchscreen still works fine with kernel 6.1.4 using
>>>>>> - an HP x2 detachable 10-p0xx or
>>>>>> - a Lenovo yoga 520-14ikb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So it could be a hardware dependent issue
>>>>> 
>>>>> See the ticket for more details.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [TLDR for the rest of this mail: I'm adding this report to the list of
>>>>> tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a
>>>>> few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar
>>>>> form.]
>>>>> 
>>>>> BTW, let me use this mail to also add the report to the list of tracked
>>>>> regressions to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks:
>>>>> 
>>>>> #regzbot introduced: v5.15..v5.16
>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216946
>>>>> #regzbot title: hid: touchscreen broken with Toshiba satellite click
>>>>> mini l9w-b
>>>>> #regzbot ignore-activity
>>>>> 
>>>>> This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
>>>>> discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
>>>>> the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
>>>>> something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
>>>>> while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
>>>>> the footer of this mail.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
>>>>> to the report (e.g. the buzgzilla ticket and maybe this mail as well, if
>>>>> this thread sees some discussion). See page linked in footer for details.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>>>>> --
>>>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>>