Re: [RFC 0/4] convert create_page_buffers to create_folio_buffers

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 4/17/23 04:27, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 03:47:13PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > @@ -2333,13 +2395,15 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio,
> > get_block_t *get_block)
> >          if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) && IS_VERITY(inode))
> >                  limit = inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes;
> >
> > -       VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio), folio);
> > -
> >          head = create_folio_buffers(folio, inode, 0);
> >          blocksize = head->b_size;
> >          bbits = block_size_bits(blocksize);
> >
> > -       iblock = (sector_t)folio->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - bbits);
> > +       if (WARN_ON(PAGE_SHIFT < bbits)) {
> > +               iblock = (sector_t)folio->index >> (bbits - PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +       } else {
> > +               iblock = (sector_t)folio->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - bbits);
> > +       }
> >          lblock = (limit+blocksize-1) >> bbits;
> >          bh = head;
> >          nr = 0;
>
> BTW I See this pattern in:
>
> fs/mpage.c: do_mpage_readpage()
> fs/mpage.c: __mpage_writepage()
>
> A helper might be in order.

But only _iff_ we decide to stick with buffer_heads and upgrade the 
buffer_head code to handle multi-page block sizes.
The idea was to move over to iomap, hence I'm not sure into which
lengths we should go keeping buffer_heads alive ...

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman