Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add ftrace direct call for arm64

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:56:45 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> IIUC Steve was hoping to take the FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL series through the
> trace tree, and if that's still the plan, maybe both should go that way?

The conflict is minor, and I think I prefer to still have the ARM64 bits go
through the arm64 tree, as it will get better testing, and I don't like to
merge branches ;-)

I've added Linus to the Cc so he knows that there will be conflicts, but as
long as we mention it in our pull request, with a branch that includes the
solution, it should be fine going through two different trees.

-- Steve