[syzbot] [fs?] possible deadlock in quotactl_fd

From: syzbot
Date: Tue Apr 11 2023 - 02:54:24 EST


Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 0d3eb744aed4 Merge tag 'urgent-rcu.2023.04.07a' of git://g..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11798e4bc80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c21559e740385326
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cdcd444e4d3a256ada13
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a02928003efa/disk-0d3eb744.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7839447005a4/vmlinux-0d3eb744.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d26ab3184148/bzImage-0d3eb744.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+cdcd444e4d3a256ada13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.3.0-rc6-syzkaller-00016-g0d3eb744aed4 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.3/11858 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802a3bc0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_quotactl_fd+0x174/0x3f0 fs/quota/quota.c:997

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802a3bc460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __do_sys_quotactl_fd+0xd3/0x3f0 fs/quota/quota.c:990

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1477 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1552 [inline]
write_mmp_block+0xc4/0x820 fs/ext4/mmp.c:50
ext4_multi_mount_protect+0x50d/0xac0 fs/ext4/mmp.c:343
__ext4_remount fs/ext4/super.c:6543 [inline]
ext4_reconfigure+0x242b/0x2b60 fs/ext4/super.c:6642
reconfigure_super+0x40c/0xa30 fs/super.c:956
vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:254 [inline]
__do_sys_fsconfig+0xa3a/0xc20 fs/fsopen.c:439
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1af/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
down_write+0x92/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
__do_sys_quotactl_fd+0x174/0x3f0 fs/quota/quota.c:997
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(sb_writers#4);
lock(&type->s_umount_key#31);
lock(sb_writers#4);
lock(&type->s_umount_key#31);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.3/11858:
#0: ffff88802a3bc460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __do_sys_quotactl_fd+0xd3/0x3f0 fs/quota/quota.c:990

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11858 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc6-syzkaller-00016-g0d3eb744aed4 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/30/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2178
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1af/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
down_write+0x92/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
__do_sys_quotactl_fd+0x174/0x3f0 fs/quota/quota.c:997
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f81d2e8c169
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f81d3b29168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001bb
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f81d2fabf80 RCX: 00007f81d2e8c169
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff80000300 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f81d2ee7ca1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fffeeb18d7f R14: 00007f81d3b29300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.