Re: [PATCH v1] usb: typec: tcpm: Add kernel config to wrap around tcpm logs

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Mon Apr 10 2023 - 18:13:09 EST


On 4/10/23 13:57, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:00 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 02:00:08AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 1:27 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 01:08:55AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:45 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 07:31:34AM +0000, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
This change adds CONFIG_TCPM_LOG_WRAPAROUND which when set allows the
logs to be wrapped around. Additionally, when set, does not clear
the TCPM logs when dumped.

Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig
index e6b88ca4a4b9..4dd2b594dfc9 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ config TYPEC_TCPCI
help
Type-C Port Controller driver for TCPCI-compliant controller.

+config TCPM_LOG_WRAPAROUND
+ bool "Enable TCPM log wraparound"
+ help
+ When set, wraps around TCPM logs and does not clear the logs when dumped. TCPM logs by
+ default gets cleared when dumped and does not wraparound when full.

Kconfig help text needs to be wrapped at the properly width.

I assumed that the width is 100 characters, but it looks like it is
80. Will fix it in the next version.

And you do not provide any hint here as to why this is not the default
option, or why someone would want this.

"TCPM logs by default gets cleared when dumped and does not wraparound
when full." was intended
to convey why someone would want to set this. Perhaps it's not effective.

Does the below look better:
"TCPM logs by default gets cleared when dumped and does not wraparound
when full. This can be overridden by setting this config.
When the config is set, TCPM wraps around logs and does not clear the
logs when dumped."

Also, I could make this default if that's OK with Guenter.


So, why is this not just the default operation anyway? Why would you
ever want the logs cleared?

I remember Guenter mentioning that he was finding it useful to not
wrap around the logs to fix problems
during tcpm_register_port (init sequence). IMHO wrapping around the
logs helps to triage interoperability
issues uncovered during testing. So both approaches have their own advantages.

But as this is a build-time option, what would cause someone to choose
one over the other, and then when the system is running, they can't
change them?

During initial phases of bringup, it makes sense to not wrap around
the logs, but, once bringup is done its most effective to wraparound
so that interop issues reported by the end users can be triaged where
TCPM logs are very effective.

Not really, because the problem tends to be the remote device
(or at least it used to be), not a driver under development.

Thanks for clarifying Guenter !
Right now if we DONT wrap around, once an issue is observed with a
remote device, the logs have to be cleared(if already full) and then
the issue has to be reproduced to collect the TCPM logbuffer
logsagain.

Having a log available _all_ the time, not just when explicitly
enabled is still very useful to catch hard to reproduce intertop
issues.

Given this would you be OK if I change the logic to wrap around always ?

IMHO based on what I have seen in the last couple of years, this would
also cover the boot with accessory connected as if the link gets into
a reset loop, the sequence after the reset reveals what had gone
wrong.


I have no strong opinion. As I said, maybe conditions have changed.
When I wrote the code, failure conditions happened all the time, and
reset loops overwrote the log repeatedly. I didn't implement the current
code because I was lazy or something, it was because wrap-around
did not work for me. Again, maybe the situation has changed.
And, to follow-up on Greg's question, maybe switching to tracing
instead of re-implementing it would make sense nowadays. I simply
don't know. I'll accept whatever solution you and Greg can agree on.

Thanks,
Guenter