Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to inline function

[Guru Mehar Rachaputi]

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:49:15PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:25:57AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:43:56AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > > good luck!
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Thanks for taking time.
> > 
> > If my understanding is correct, every version of the patch should
> > include all the patches/patchfiles and it should explain what happened in each
> > version(in decrement order) through a coverletter. Please correct me otherwise.
> 
> Hi Guru,
> Other than the cover letter, each individual patch should also include the patch
> version history in the descending order. If a specific patch(es) that is/are
> part of a patch-set, did not have any change, we should still increment its
> version and record "none" as the change in current version for such patches.
> 
> However, from the patch-set, any patches that are acked, do not need to be
> resent along with other patches that are still under revision. But do mentioned
> about such accepted/acked patches in the cover letter.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Thanks,
> deepak.
> 
> > 
> > I do refer "first patch submission" and above is my current
> > understanding.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Guru
> > 
> 
> 
Thanks for the info, deepak.
Is is possible for you to share some reference that is easy to
understand. It would be helpful.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Guru