Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix possible memory leak in smb2_lock()

From: Namjae Jeon
Date: Mon Feb 06 2023 - 18:45:04 EST


2023-02-06 11:36 GMT+09:00, Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>:
> argv needs to be free when setup_async_work fails or when the current
> process is woken up.
>
> Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3")
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2: avoid NULL pointer dereference in set_close_state_blocked_works()
>
> fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 5 +++++
> fs/ksmbd/vfs_cache.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> index d681f91947d9..177a24704021 100644
> --- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> @@ -7050,6 +7050,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> smb2_remove_blocked_lock,
> argv);
> if (rc) {
> + kfree(argv);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -7072,6 +7073,8 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> spin_lock(&fp->f_lock);
> list_del(&work->fp_entry);
> spin_unlock(&fp->f_lock);
> + kfree(argv);
> + work->cancel_fn = NULL;
> rsp->hdr.Status =
> STATUS_CANCELLED;
> kfree(smb_lock);
> @@ -7096,6 +7099,8 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> spin_lock(&fp->f_lock);
> list_del(&work->fp_entry);
> spin_unlock(&fp->f_lock);
> + kfree(argv);
> + work->cancel_fn = NULL;
This doesn't seem so simple... You have to consider the racy issue
between this change and smb2_cancel(). Also, how are you testing this
patch?

> goto retry;
> } else if (!rc) {
> spin_lock(&work->conn->llist_lock);
> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/vfs_cache.c b/fs/ksmbd/vfs_cache.c
> index da9163b00350..eb95c16393b7 100644
> --- a/fs/ksmbd/vfs_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/vfs_cache.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ static void set_close_state_blocked_works(struct
> ksmbd_file *fp)
> list_del(&cancel_work->fp_entry);
> cancel_work->state = KSMBD_WORK_CLOSED;
> cancel_work->cancel_fn(cancel_work->cancel_argv);
> + kfree(cancel_work->cancel_argv);
> + cancel_work->cancel_fn = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock(&fp->f_lock);
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>