Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture tests

[John Stultz]

On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:20 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 11:07:53AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:
> >
> > > This patch adds randomized nested locking to the mutex torture
> > > tests, as well as new LOCK08 config files for testing mutexes
> > > with nested locking
> > >
> > > This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
> > > by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
> > >  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
> > >
> > > Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Just realized I sent two review tags for rtmutex, one was supposed
> > to be this patch.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thank you!
>
> I will apply this to these commits on my next rebase:
>
> f5a632cbbbea ("locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture tests")
> 83743c9839f5 ("locktorture: Add nested locking to rtmutex torture tests")
>
> John, if you send a new version of these, please add Davidlohr's review
> tags.

Yeah. I'll respin to address most of the feedback.

thanks
-john