Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: use optee system invocation

[Etienne Carriere]

Hello Sudeep,

On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 18:04, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 02:36:26PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > > Changes SCMI optee transport to enable sys_service capability of
> > > its tee context to leverage provisioned system resources in OP-TEE
> > > preventing possible deadlock.
> > >
> > > Such deadlock could happen when many Linux clients invoke OP-TEE are
> > > are all suspended waiting for an OP-TEE RPC request access an SCMI
> > > resource through the SCMI OP-TEE PTA service.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> > > index 2a7aeab40e54..91840345e946 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> > > @@ -559,6 +559,9 @@ static int scmi_optee_service_probe(struct device *dev)
> > >     if (IS_ERR(tee_ctx))
> > >             return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > +   /* SCMI agent can used TEE system service resources */
> > > +   tee_ctx->sys_service = true;
> > > +
> > >     agent = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*agent), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >     if (!agent) {
> > >             ret = -ENOMEM;
> >
> > LGTM.
> >
> > I suppose you'll sync-up with Sudeep for how to queue this whole series.
> >
>
> I thought I had responded to this but not. Anyways since TEE changes are
> significant than SCMI, you can route it via TEE tree. In that case,
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
>
> Let me know if that was not your plan.

That's fine. Thanks. I'll ask Jens to apply it next to the optee commit.

Regards,
Etienne

>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep