Re: [PATCH] x86: enable Data Operand Independent Timing Mode
From: Dave Hansen
Date: Fri Feb 03 2023 - 13:26:56 EST
BTW, I'm basically moving forward assuming that we're going to apply
this patch in _some_ form. I'm going to make some changes, but I'll
discuss them in this thread to make sure we're all on the same page first.
On 1/24/23 17:28, Eric Biggers wrote:
> +Affected CPUs
> +-------------
> +
> +This vulnerability affects Intel Core family processors based on the Ice Lake
> +and later microarchitectures, and Intel Atom family processors based on the
> +Gracemont and later microarchitectures. For more information, see Intel's
> +documentation [1]_.
I had a hard time following the docs in this area.
But I'm not sure this statement is correct. The docs actually say:
For Intel® Core™ family processors based on microarchitectures
before Ice Lake and Intel Atom® family processors based on
microarchitectures before Gracemont that do not enumerate
IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL, developers may assume that the instructions
listed here operate as if DOITM is enabled.
A processor needs to be before "Ice Lake" and friends *AND* not
enumerate IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL to be unaffected.
There's also another tweak that's needed because:
Processors that do not enumerate IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES[DOITM]
when the latest microcode is applied do not need to set
IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL [DOITM] in order to have the behavior
described in this document...
First, we need to mention the "latest microcode" thing in the kernel
docs. I also _think_ the whole "microarchitectures before" stuff is
rather irrelevant and we can simplify this down to:
This vulnerability affects all Intel processors that support
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES and set MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES[DOITM]
when the latest microcode is applied.
Which reminds me. This:
> +void update_doitm_msr(void)
> +{
> + u64 msr;
> +
> + if (doitm_off)
> + return;
> +
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL, msr);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL, msr | UARCH_MISC_DOITM);
> +}
should probably be:
void update_doitm_msr(void)
{
u64 msr;
/*
* All processors that enumerate support for DOIT
* are affected *and* have the mitigation available.
*/
if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_DODT))
return;
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL, msr);
if (doitm_off)
msr &= ~UARCH_MISC_DOITM;
else
msr |= UARCH_MISC_DOITM;
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL, msr);
}
in case the CPU isn't actually coming out of reset, like if kexec() left
DOITM=1.