[RFC PATCH 29/32] KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace

From: James Morse
Date: Fri Feb 03 2023 - 09:05:47 EST


From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>

When capability KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER is available, userspace can
request to handle all hypercalls that aren't handled by KVM. With the
help of another capability, this will allow userspace to handle PSCI
calls.

Suggested-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>

---

Notes on this implementation:

* A similar mechanism was proposed for SDEI some time ago [1]. This RFC
generalizes the idea to all hypercalls, since that was suggested on
the list [2, 3].

* We're reusing kvm_run.hypercall. I copied x0-x5 into
kvm_run.hypercall.args[] to help userspace but I'm tempted to remove
this, because:
- Most user handlers will need to write results back into the
registers (x0-x3 for SMCCC), so if we keep this shortcut we should
go all the way and read them back on return to kernel.
- QEMU doesn't care about this shortcut, it pulls all vcpu regs before
handling the call.
- SMCCC uses x0-x16 for parameters.
x0 does contain the SMCCC function ID and may be useful for fast
dispatch, we could keep that plus the immediate number.

* Add a flag in the kvm_run.hypercall telling whether this is HVC or
SMC? Can be added later in those bottom longmode and pad fields.

* On top of this we could share with userspace which HVC ranges are
available and which ones are handled by KVM. That can actually be added
independently, through a vCPU/VM device attribute which doesn't consume
a new ioctl:
- userspace issues HAS_ATTR ioctl on the vcpu fd to query whether this
feature is available.
- userspace queries the number N of HVC ranges using one GET_ATTR.
- userspace passes an array of N ranges using another GET_ATTR. The
array is filled and returned by KVM.

* Enabling this using a vCPU arch feature rather than the whole-VM
capability would be fine, but it would be difficult to do the same for
the following psci-in-user capability. So let's enable everything at
the VM scope.

* No idea whether this work out of the box for AArch32 guests.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170808164616.25949-12-james.morse@xxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/bf7e83f1-c58e-8d65-edd0-d08f27b8b766@xxxxxxx/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/f56cf420-affc-35f0-2355-801a924b8a35@xxxxxxx/
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 17 +++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 5 +++++
arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/kvm/arm_psci.h | 4 ++++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index deb494f759ed..9a28a9cc1163 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -6122,8 +6122,12 @@ to the byte array.
__u32 pad;
} hypercall;

-Unused. This was once used for 'hypercall to userspace'. To implement
-such functionality, use KVM_EXIT_IO (x86) or KVM_EXIT_MMIO (all except s390).
+On x86 this was once used for 'hypercall to userspace'. To implement such
+functionality, use KVM_EXIT_IO (x86) or KVM_EXIT_MMIO (all except s390).
+
+On arm64 it is used for hypercalls, when the KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER capability
+is enabled. 'nr' contains the HVC or SMC immediate. 'args' contains registers
+x0 - x5. The other parameters are unused.

.. note:: KVM_EXIT_IO is significantly faster than KVM_EXIT_MMIO.

@@ -8276,6 +8280,15 @@ structure.
When getting the Modified Change Topology Report value, the attr->addr
must point to a byte where the value will be stored or retrieved from.

+8.37 KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER
+----------------------------
+
+:Architecture: arm64
+
+This capability indicates that KVM can pass unhandled hypercalls to userspace,
+if the VMM enables it. Hypercalls are passed with KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL in
+kvm_run::hypercall.
+
9. Known KVM API problems
=========================

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 35a159d131b5..40911ebfa710 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EL1_32BIT 4
/* PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND enabled for the guest */
#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND_ENABLED 5
+#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HVC_TO_USER 6

unsigned long flags;

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 9c5573bc4614..815b7e8f88e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
r = 0;
set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND_ENABLED, &kvm->arch.flags);
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER:
+ r = 0;
+ set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HVC_TO_USER, &kvm->arch.flags);
+ break;
default:
r = -EINVAL;
break;
@@ -230,6 +234,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
case KVM_CAP_ARM_SYSTEM_SUSPEND:
+ case KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER:
r = 1;
break;
case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG2:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
index c9f401fa01a9..efaf05d40dab 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
@@ -121,6 +121,28 @@ static bool kvm_hvc_call_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 func_id)
}
}

+static int kvm_hvc_user(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+
+ if (!test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HVC_TO_USER, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags)) {
+ smccc_set_retval(vcpu, SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED, 0, 0, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+ run->hypercall.nr = kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu);
+ /* Add the first parameters for fast access. */
+ for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
+ run->hypercall.args[i] = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, i);
+ run->hypercall.ret = 0;
+ run->hypercall.longmode = 0;
+ run->hypercall.pad = 0;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_smccc_features *smccc_feat = &vcpu->kvm->arch.smccc_feat;
@@ -219,8 +241,12 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
case ARM_SMCCC_TRNG_RND32:
case ARM_SMCCC_TRNG_RND64:
return kvm_trng_call(vcpu);
- default:
+ case KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE...KVM_PSCI_FN_LAST:
+ case PSCI_0_2_FN_BASE...PSCI_0_2_FN_LAST:
+ case PSCI_0_2_FN64_BASE...PSCI_0_2_FN64_LAST:
return kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
+ default:
+ return kvm_hvc_user(vcpu);
}

out:
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
index 6e55b9283789..7391fa51419a 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@

#define KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_1

+#define KVM_PSCI_FN_LAST KVM_PSCI_FN(3)
+#define PSCI_0_2_FN_LAST PSCI_0_2_FN(0x3f)
+#define PSCI_0_2_FN64_LAST PSCI_0_2_FN64(0x3f)
+
static inline int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
/*
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 55155e262646..2ead8b9aae56 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
#define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL 223
#define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED_ASYNC_DISABLE 224
#define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP 225
+#define KVM_CAP_ARM_HVC_TO_USER 226

#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING

--
2.30.2