RE: [PATCH 01/13] rcu/kvfree: Add kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() and kfree_rcu_mightsleep()

[Zhuo, Qiuxu]

> From: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 11:08 PM
> To: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; RCU <rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paul E .
> McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>; Oleksiy Avramchenko
> <oleksiy.avramchenko@xxxxxxxx>; Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>; Philipp
> Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bryan Tan <bryantan@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx>; Ariel
> Levkovich <lariel@xxxxxxxxxx>; Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>; Julian
> Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 01/13] rcu/kvfree: Add kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() and
> kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
> 
> These two macroses will replace single-argument k[v]free_rcu() ones.
> By adding an extra _mightsleep prefix we can avoid of situations when someone

s/prefix/suffix

> intended to give a second argument but forgot to do it in a code where sleeping
> is illegal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ...