Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] ATU and FDB synchronization on locked ports

[netdev]

On 2023-01-31 20:25, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Will try to review tomorrow, but it looks like this set is missing
> selftests. What about extending bridge_locked_port.sh?

I knew you would take this up. :-)
But I am not sure that it's so easy to have selftests here as it is 
timing based and it would take the 5+ minutes just waiting to test in 
the stadard case, and there is opnly support for mv88e6xxx driver with 
this patch set.