Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: bridge: ensure FDB offloaded flag is handled as needed

[netdev]

On 2023-02-01 19:24, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> This also looks correct, but the function name is not really accurate
> anymore. I guess you can keep it as-is unless someone has a better name
>
> >  		fdb_delete(br, fdb, swdev_notify);
> >  	else
> >  		err = -ENOENT;
> > --
> > 2.34.1

I have been wondering if it makes sense to have both external_learn and 
offloaded flags as they now work pretty much the same seen from the 
bridge. But as I don't know other switches, I guess there is some good 
reason to have the two?