Re: [PATCH] perf arm-spe: Only warn once for each unsupported address packet

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:13:52AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:55:46PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Unknown address packet indexes are not an error as the Arm architecture
> > can (and has with SPEv1.2) define new ones and implementation defined
> > ones are also allowed. The error message for every occurrence of the
> > packet is needlessly noisy as well. Change the message to print just
> > once for each unknown index.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c
> > index 091987dd3966..40dcedfd75cd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ static u64 arm_spe_calc_ip(int index, u64 payload)
> >  		/* Clean highest byte */
> >  		payload = SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_GET_BYTES_0_6(payload);
> >  	} else {
> > -		pr_err("unsupported address packet index: 0x%x\n", index);
> > +		static u32 seen_idx = 0;
> > +		if (!(seen_idx & BIT(index))) {
> > +			seen_idx |= BIT(index);
> > +			pr_warning("ignoring unsupported address packet index: 0x%x\n", index);
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return payload;
> > -- 
> > 2.39.0
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo