Re: [PATCH] irqchip/apple-aic: Correctly map the vgic maintenance interrupt

[Hector Martin]

On 02/02/2023 01.40, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We currently allocate the vgic maintenance interrupt by calling into
> the low-level irqdomain code. Not only this is unnecessary, but this
> is also pretty wrong: we end-up skipping a bunch of irqdesc state
> setup
> 
> A simple "cat /proc/interrupt" shows how wrong we are, as the
> interrupt appears as "Edge" instead of "Level".
> 
> Instead, just call the standard irq_create_fwspec_mapping(), which
> is the right tool for the job. Duh.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     This applies to Oliver's kvm-arm64/apple-vgic-mi branch.
> 
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> index 09fd52d91e45..76ee7c5e7b7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> @@ -1201,9 +1201,7 @@ static int __init aic_of_ic_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *p
>  			},
>  		};
>  
> -		vgic_info.maint_irq = irq_domain_alloc_irqs(irqc->hw_domain,
> -							    1, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> -							    &mi);
> +		vgic_info.maint_irq = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&mi);
>  		WARN_ON(!vgic_info.maint_irq);
>  	}
>  

Reviewed-by: Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx>

- Hector