Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] x86/psp: Register PSP platform device when ASP table is present

[Jeremi Piotrowski]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:49:54PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/23/23 09:22, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> >The ASP table contains the memory location of the register window for
> >communication with the Platform Security Processor. The device is not
> >exposed as an acpi node, so it is necessary to probe for the table and
> >register a platform_device to represent it in the kernel.
> >
> >At least conceptually, the same PSP may be exposed on the PCIe bus as
> >well, in which case it would be necessary to choose whether to use a PCI
> >BAR or the register window defined in ASPT for communication. There is
> >no advantage to using the ACPI and there are no known bare-metal systems
> >that expose the ASP table, so device registration is restricted to the
> >only systems known to provide an ASPT: Hyper-V VMs. Hyper-V VMs also do
> >not expose the PSP over PCIe.
> >
> >This is a skeleton device at this point, as the ccp driver is not yet
> >prepared to correctly probe it. Interrupt configuration will come later
> >on as well.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile |  2 +-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/psp.c    | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Based on comments about other SEV related items, this should
> probably be moved into the arch/x86/coco/sev/ directory.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom

I'll do that. This will make the code depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM
and CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT, the latter selects the former. This will work
as long as CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT continues to be needed for both SNP guest
and host sides.

Jeremi

> 
> >  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/psp.c
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> >index f901658d9f7c..e2e19f2d08a7 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> >@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC)		+= unwind_orc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER)	+= unwind_frame.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_GUESS)		+= unwind_guess.o
> >-obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)		+= sev.o
> >+obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)		+= psp.o sev.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG)			+= cfi.o
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/psp.c b/arch/x86/kernel/psp.c
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 000000000000..d404df47cc04
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/psp.c
> >@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> >+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >+
> >+#include <linux/platform_data/psp.h>
> >+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >+#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> >+
> >+static struct platform_device psp_device = {
> >+	.name           = "psp",
> >+	.id             = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> >+};
> >+
> >+static int __init psp_init_platform_device(void)
> >+{
> >+	struct psp_platform_data pdata = {};
> >+	struct resource res[1];
> >+	int err;
> >+
> >+	/*
> >+	 * The ACPI PSP interface is mutually exclusive with the PCIe interface,
> >+	 * but there is no reason to use the ACPI interface over the PCIe one.
> >+	 * Restrict probing ACPI PSP to platforms known to only expose the ACPI
> >+	 * interface, which at this time is SNP-host capable Hyper-V VMs.
> >+	 */
> >+	if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_MS_HYPERV))
> >+		return -ENODEV;
> >+
> >+	err = acpi_parse_aspt(res, &pdata);
> >+	if (err)
> >+		return err;
> >+	err = platform_device_add_resources(&psp_device, res, 1);
> >+	if (err)
> >+		return err;
> >+
> >+	err = platform_device_register(&psp_device);
> >+	if (err)
> >+		return err;
> >+	return 0;
> >+}
> >+device_initcall(psp_init_platform_device);