[PATCH] seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sat Jan 07 2023 - 21:13:00 EST


Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
eliminating a kernel-doc warning:

kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
}
#endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */

+#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
/**
* seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
* @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
*
* Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
*/
-#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
struct seccomp_filter **match)
{