Re: [PATCH] udf: initialize newblock to 0

From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Jan 02 2023 - 07:50:37 EST


On Fri 30-12-22 12:53:41, Tom Rix wrote:
> The clang build reports this error
> fs/udf/inode.c:805:6: error: variable 'newblock' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> if (*err < 0)
> ^~~~~~~~
> newblock is never set before error handling jump.
> Initialize newblock to 0 and remove redundant settings.
>
> Fixes: d8b39db5fab8 ("udf: Handle error when adding extent to a file")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks! I've added the patch to my tree.

Honza

> ---
> fs/udf/inode.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
> index 4a912e2edcec..31965c3798f2 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
> struct kernel_lb_addr eloc, tmpeloc;
> int c = 1;
> loff_t lbcount = 0, b_off = 0;
> - udf_pblk_t newblocknum, newblock;
> + udf_pblk_t newblocknum, newblock = 0;
> sector_t offset = 0;
> int8_t etype;
> struct udf_inode_info *iinfo = UDF_I(inode);
> @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
> ret = udf_do_extend_file(inode, &prev_epos, laarr, hole_len);
> if (ret < 0) {
> *err = ret;
> - newblock = 0;
> goto out_free;
> }
> c = 0;
> @@ -775,7 +774,6 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
> goal, err);
> if (!newblocknum) {
> *err = -ENOSPC;
> - newblock = 0;
> goto out_free;
> }
> if (isBeyondEOF)
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR