Re: [PATCH 595/606] w1: ds2482: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Thu Dec 22 2022 - 18:13:13 EST


Hello Evgeniy,

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:45:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
> can be trivially converted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/w1/masters/ds2482.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2482.c b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2482.c
> index 62c44616d8a9..3d8b51316bef 100644
> --- a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2482.c
> +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2482.c
> @@ -442,8 +442,7 @@ static u8 ds2482_w1_set_pullup(void *data, int delay)
> }
>
>
> -static int ds2482_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> - const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int ds2482_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct ds2482_data *data;
> int err = -ENODEV;
> @@ -553,7 +552,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver ds2482_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "ds2482",
> },
> - .probe = ds2482_probe,
> + .probe_new = ds2482_probe,
> .remove = ds2482_remove,
> .id_table = ds2482_id,
> };

Assuming you don't have any concerns, it would be great if you applied
this patch for the next merge window.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature