[PATCH 1/3] softirq: rename ksoftirqd_running() -> ksoftirqd_should_handle()

[Jakub Kicinski]

ksoftirqd_running() takes the high priority softirqs into
consideration, so ksoftirqd_should_handle() seems like
a better name.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index c8a6913c067d..00b838d566c1 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void wakeup_softirqd(void)
  * unless we're doing some of the synchronous softirqs.
  */
 #define SOFTIRQ_NOW_MASK ((1 << HI_SOFTIRQ) | (1 << TASKLET_SOFTIRQ))
-static bool ksoftirqd_running(unsigned long pending)
+static bool ksoftirqd_should_handle(unsigned long pending)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk = __this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd);
 
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
 		goto out;
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
-	if (!pending || ksoftirqd_running(pending))
+	if (!pending || ksoftirqd_should_handle(pending))
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static inline bool should_wake_ksoftirqd(void)
 
 static inline void invoke_softirq(void)
 {
-	if (ksoftirqd_running(local_softirq_pending()))
+	if (ksoftirqd_should_handle(local_softirq_pending()))
 		return;
 
 	if (!force_irqthreads() || !__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd)) {
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void do_softirq(void)
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
 
-	if (pending && !ksoftirqd_running(pending))
+	if (pending && !ksoftirqd_should_handle(pending))
 		do_softirq_own_stack();
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
-- 
2.38.1