On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 14:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Hi Srinivas,
On 09/12/2022 02:36, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
The users of idle injection framework allow 100% idle injection.
For
example: thermal/cpuidle_cooling.c driver. When the ratio set to
100%,
the runtime_duration becomes zero.
In the function idle_inject_set_duration() in idle injection
framework
run_duration_us == 0 is silently ignored, without any error (it is
a
void function). So, the caller will assume that everything is fine
and
100% idle is effective. But in reality the idle inject will be
whatever
set before.
Good catch
There are two options:
- The caller change their max state to 99% instead of 100% and
document that 100% is not supported by idle inject framework
- Support 100% idle support in idle inject framework
Yes, from my POV a CPU being impossible to cool down for any reason
should end up by staying off.
Since there are other protections via RT throttling, this framework
can
allow 100% idle. The RT throttling will be activated at 95% idle by
default. The caller disabling RT throttling and injecting 100%
idle,
should be aware that CPU can't be used at all.
Would it make sense to write a trace in this case ?
There is one printk already:
printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated\n")
You mean we should add
trace_sched_* for this?
I will submit a patch for this.The idle inject timer is started for (run_duration_us +
idle_duration_us)
duration. Hence replace (run_duration_us && idle_duration_us) with
(run_duration_us + idle_duration_us) in the function
idle_inject_set_duration().
Sounds good to me
Thanks,
Srinivas
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c
b/drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c
index f48e71501429..4a4fe60d2563 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ void idle_inject_set_duration(struct
idle_inject_device *ii_dev,
unsigned int run_duration_us,
unsigned int idle_duration_us)
{
- if (run_duration_us && idle_duration_us) {
+ if (run_duration_us + idle_duration_us) {
WRITE_ONCE(ii_dev->run_duration_us,
run_duration_us);
WRITE_ONCE(ii_dev->idle_duration_us,
idle_duration_us);
}