Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/selftests: Add test for event filtering on function name

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:20:39 -0700
Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/19/22 15:35, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:11:39 -0700
> > Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 12/19/22 13:57, Ross Zwisler wrote:  
> >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:  
> >>>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> With the new filter logic of passing in the name of a function to match an
> >>>> instruction pointer (or the address of the function), add a test to make
> >>>> sure that it is functional.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is also the first test to test plain filtering. The filtering has
> >>>> been tested via the trigger logic, which uses the same code, but there was
> >>>> nothing to test just the event filter, so this test is the first to add
> >>>> such a case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Cc: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@xxxxxxxxxx>  
> >>
> >> Thank you both. I will apply this after rc1 comes out.  
> > 
> > It's dependent on the first patch.
> >   
> 
> In which case,
> 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Thanks Shuah!

-- Steve