RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos850

From: Sriranjani P
Date: Tue Dec 13 2022 - 23:44:54 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 December 2022 02:40
> To: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add
> dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos850
>
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:20:29PM +0530, Sriranjani P wrote:
> > Exynos850 has two different SYSREGs, hence add dedicated compatibles
> > for them and deprecate usage of generic Exynos850 compatible alone.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sysreg.yaml | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-
> sysreg.
> > yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-
> sysreg.
> > yaml index 4954790eda6c..a37452965100 100644
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-
> sysreg.
> > yaml
> > +++
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sys
> > +++ reg.yaml
> > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ properties:
> > - samsung,exynos3-sysreg
> > - samsung,exynos4-sysreg
> > - samsung,exynos5-sysreg
> > - - samsung,exynos850-sysreg
> > - samsung,exynosautov9-sysreg
> > - tesla,fsd-cam-sysreg
> > - tesla,fsd-fsys0-sysreg @@ -33,9 +32,17 @@ properties:
> > - const: samsung,exynos5433-sysreg
> > - const: syscon
> > - items:
> > - - const: samsung,exynos5433-sysreg
> > + - enum:
> > + - const: samsung,exynos5433-sysreg
>
> This says the compatible entry is "const: samsung,exynos5433-sysreg".
>
> That should be a schema warning. You did test this, right?
Thanks for pointing it out, somehow dtbs check not showed any error. Will
fix it in the next version.
>
> Rob