Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Optimize operations with single max CPU capacity

From: Vincent Guittot
Date: Thu Dec 08 2022 - 03:38:06 EST


On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 11:17, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The max CPU capacity is the same for all CPUs sharing frequency domain
> and thus 'policy' object. There is a way to avoid heavy operations
> in a loop for each CPU by leveraging this knowledge. Thus, simplify
> the looping code in the sugov_next_freq_shared() and drop heavy
> multiplications. Instead, use simple max() to get the highest utilization
> from these CPUs. This is useful for platforms with many (4 or 6) little
> CPUs.
>
> The max CPU capacity must be fetched every time we are called, due to
> difficulties during the policy setup, where we are not able to get the
> normalized CPU capacity at the right time.
>
> The stored value in sugov_policy::max is also than used in
> sugov_iowait_apply() to calculate the right boost. Thus, that field is
> useful to have in that sugov_policy struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index c19d6de67b7a..f9881f3d9488 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
>
> static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> {
> - struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
>
> - sg_policy->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(sg_cpu->cpu);
> sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
> sg_cpu->util = effective_cpu_util(sg_cpu->cpu, cpu_util_cfs(sg_cpu->cpu),
> FREQUENCY_UTIL, NULL);
> @@ -317,6 +315,8 @@ static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,
> u64 time, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
> +
> sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
> sg_cpu->last_update = time;
>
> @@ -325,6 +325,9 @@ static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,
> if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_cpu->sg_policy, time))
> return false;
>
> + /* Fetch the latest CPU capcity to avoid stale data */
> + sg_policy->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(sg_cpu->cpu);
> +
> sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
> sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time);
>
> @@ -414,25 +417,22 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
> {
> struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
> - unsigned long util = 0, max = 1;
> + unsigned long util = 0;
> unsigned int j;
>
> + /* Fetch the latest CPU capcity to avoid stale data */
> + sg_policy->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(sg_cpu->cpu);
> +
> for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
> struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
> - unsigned long j_util, j_max;
>
> sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
> sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time);
> - j_util = j_sg_cpu->util;
> - j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
>
> - if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
> - util = j_util;
> - max = j_max;
> - }

With the code removed above, max is only used in 2 places:
- sugov_iowait_apply
- map_util_freq

I wonder if it would be better to just call arch_scale_cpu_capacity()
in these 2 places instead of saving a copy in sg_policy and then
reading it twice.

arch_scaleu_cpu_capacity is already a per_cpu variable so accessing it
should be pretty cheap.

Thought ?

> + util = max(j_sg_cpu->util, util);
> }
>
> - return get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
> + return get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, sg_policy->max);
> }
>
> static void
> --
> 2.17.1
>