[PATCH linux-next] m68k: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

From: yang.yang29
Date: Sat Dec 03 2022 - 01:11:17 EST


From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));

#if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM)
- strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
- command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0;
+ strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
#endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */

process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
--
2.15.2