Re: [PATCH v2] vduse: Validate vq_num in vduse_validate_config()

From: Harshit Mogalapalli
Date: Mon Nov 28 2022 - 07:35:53 EST




On 28/11/22 4:43 pm, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 01:58:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:53:12AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:36:26AM -0800, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Add a limit to 'config->vq_num' which is user controlled data which
> comes from an vduse_ioctl to prevent large memory allocations.
>
> This is found using static analysis with smatch.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1->v2: Change title of the commit and description, add a limit to
>     vq_num.
>
> Note: I think here 0xffff is the max size of vring =  no: of vqueues.
> Only compile and boot tested.
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> index 35dceee3ed56..31017ebc4d7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> @@ -1440,6 +1440,9 @@ static bool vduse_validate_config(struct vduse_dev_config *config)
>     if (config->config_size > PAGE_SIZE)
>         return false;
>
> +    if (config->vq_num > 0xffff)

What about using U16_MAX here?

Where is the ->vq_num stored in a u16?  I looked for this but didn't
see it.

I thought vq_num referred to the number of elements in the vq (like .get_vq_num_max), since this patch wants to limit to 0xffff.

But it actually refers to the number of virtqueue, so @Harshit why do we limit it to 0xffff?


Hi Stefano,

I may be incorrect about the details of this driver, my v1 was purely based on static analysis, Micheal suggested me to put a limit of 0xffff on vq_num. I really don't know about the driver, while I was searching other parts of code, I thought 0xffff is based vring size, I have asked the same question on v1 today.

Ref to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/82e8ce27-0743-59bf-fbe8-a25093167451@xxxxxxxxxx/

Maybe we should explain it in the commit message or in a comment.


yeah, we should clarify the limit in commit message, once Micheal shares about the limit '0xffff), I will add those details and send a next version if that's okay.


Thanks,
Harshit
Thanks,
Stefano