Re: [PATCH] arm64/perf: Replace PMU version number '0' with ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_NI

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Mon Nov 28 2022 - 07:15:45 EST


On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:24:49AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> __armv8pmu_probe_pmu() returns if detected PMU is either not implemented or
> implementation defined. Extracted ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer value, when PMU is
> not implemented is '0' which can be replaced with ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_NI
> defined as '0b0000'.
>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>

This looks fine to me, so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>

I'll leave it to Will to pick this as his convenience.

Mark.

> ---
> This applies on v6.1-rc6
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 85a3aaefc0fb..b638f584b4dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -1188,7 +1188,8 @@ static void __armv8pmu_probe_pmu(void *info)
> dfr0 = read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1);
> pmuver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT);
> - if (pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF || pmuver == 0)
> + if (pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF ||
> + pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_NI)
> return;
>
> cpu_pmu->pmuver = pmuver;
> --
> 2.25.1
>