Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: sifive: Always let the first pwm_apply_state succeed

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon Nov 28 2022 - 03:25:01 EST


Hello,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 06:41:06PM +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 16:33, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:45:43PM +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > How about we merge this bug fix that can easily be backported first
> > > and then look at how it should be handled properly?
> >
> > I thought it wouldn't be that hard to do it right from the start,
> > but I admit it's harder than I expected to get right. My prototype looks
> > as follows:
>
> This works for me (modulo the two extra {'s). I'd still prefer merging

Yeah, didn't even try to compile it.

> the simpler version and then this on top for ease of backporting, but
> as long as the race is fixed I'm fine. Will you send a cleaned up
> version of this?

I'd let Thierry decide what he want here. Depending on his choice I can
clean up my suggestion (inclusive compile test) on the then relevant
state of the driver.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature