Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: split from syscon

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 25/11/2022 15:32, Sriranjani P wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 25 November 2022 16:52
>> To: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Krzysztof
>> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Alim Akhtar
>> <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-samsung-
>> soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sriranjani P
>> <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: split from
>> syscon
>>
>> Split Samsung Exynos SoC SYSREG bindings to own file to narrow the
> bindings
>> and do not allow other parts of syscon.yaml.  This allows further
> customization
>> of Samsung SoC bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> We agree for add separate YAML for  Samsung Exynos and hence I think we can 
> go ahead and add  separate yaml for Tesla FSD.
> Reviewed-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Tesla FSD should go to the same file. No need for another binding for
same design...

Best regards,
Krzysztof