Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add tesla compatibles found on FSD SoC

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Nov 25 2022 - 06:40:08 EST


On 25/11/2022 12:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/11/2022 08:06, Sriranjani P wrote:
>> Add compatible for Tesla SYSREG controllers found on FSD SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>> index 4e4baf53796d..8c3334999bec 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ properties:
>> - samsung,exynos5433-sysreg
>> - samsung,exynos850-sysreg
>> - samsung,exynosautov9-sysreg
>> + - tesla,fsd-sysreg
>
> I think we made mistake starting from 5433. Before (Exynos3/4/5) there
> was only one block called actually SYSREG. For example on Exynos5433 we
> have SYSREG_DISP, SYSREG_CAM1 and so on. These are different so we
> should have dedicated compatibles. The same for Tesla - please provide
> dedicated compatibles per each block.
>
> I'll fix Exynos5433. Maybe someone can also fix Exynos850 and Autov9.

To clarify - in case of Tesla, you do not need the fallbacks, so you
just add few of:
- tesla,fsd-xxx-sysreg
within the enum.

For Exynos850 and Autov9, just like for Exynso5433, we should keep it
backwards compatible, so we need fallbacks.

Best regards,
Krzysztof