Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Pass device instead of rpcif to rpcif_*()

From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Nov 23 2022 - 09:44:07 EST

Next message: Vinod Koul: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: remove is_sdca boolean property"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH v2 2/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Move resource acquisition to .probe()"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH v2 5/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Pass device instead of rpcif to rpcif_*()"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH v2 1/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Split-off private data from struct rpcif"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:41:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Most rpcif_*() API functions do not need access to any other fields in
> the rpcif structure than the device pointer. Simplify dependencies by
> passing the device pointer instead.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Vinod Koul: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: remove is_sdca boolean property"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH v2 2/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Move resource acquisition to .probe()"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH v2 5/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Pass device instead of rpcif to rpcif_*()"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH v2 1/6] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Split-off private data from struct rpcif"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]