Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in ax25_send_frame (2)

From: Peter Lafreniere
Date: Tue Nov 22 2022 - 16:24:30 EST

Next message: Jonathan Toppins: "[PATCH net-next v2 2/2] bonding: fix link recovery in mode 2 when updelay is nonzero"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree"
In reply to: Peter Lafreniere: "Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in ax25_send_frame (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Does anyone object to marking syzbot bugs
> "general protection fault in {ax25|rose}_send_frame (2)"
> as fixed?

As nobody seems to object to closing these reports:
#syz fix: rose: Fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()

- Peter

Next message: Jonathan Toppins: "[PATCH net-next v2 2/2] bonding: fix link recovery in mode 2 when updelay is nonzero"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree"
In reply to: Peter Lafreniere: "Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in ax25_send_frame (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]