Re: [PATCH v3 06/18] nvmem: core: drop the removal of the cells in nvmem_add_cells()

From: Sascha Hauer
Date: Mon Nov 21 2022 - 02:56:28 EST

Next message: Maxim Korotkov: "[PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()"
Previous message: Luca Weiss: "[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Use specific qmpphy compatible"
In reply to: Michael Walle: "[PATCH v3 06/18] nvmem: core: drop the removal of the cells in nvmem_add_cells()"
Next in thread: Michael Walle: "[PATCH v3 10/18] nvmem: core: add per-cell post processing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 07:51:06PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> If nvmem_add_cells() fails, the whole nvmem_register() will fail
> and the cells will then be removed anyway. This is a prepartion

s/prepartion/preparation/

Sascha

--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Next message: Maxim Korotkov: "[PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()"
Previous message: Luca Weiss: "[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Use specific qmpphy compatible"
In reply to: Michael Walle: "[PATCH v3 06/18] nvmem: core: drop the removal of the cells in nvmem_add_cells()"
Next in thread: Michael Walle: "[PATCH v3 10/18] nvmem: core: add per-cell post processing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]