Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert semtech,sx150xq bindings to dt-schema

[Sander Vanheule]

Hi,

On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 11:06 +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> This converts the Semtech SX150Xq bindings to dt-schemas, add necessary
> bindings documentation to cover all differences between HW variants
> and current bindings usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Resent with missing To: Linus Walleij
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005-mdm9615-sx1509q-yaml-v2-0-a4a5b8eecc7b@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - fixed rob comments
> - added rob's Reviewed-by
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005-mdm9615-sx1509q-yaml-v1-0-0c26649b637c@xxxxxxxxxx
> ---

[snip]

> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - semtech,sx1503q
> +              - semtech,sx1506q
> +    then:
> +      patternProperties:
> +        '-cfg$':
> +          properties:
> +            pins:
> +              items:
> +                pattern: '^gpio[0-15]$'

[snip]

> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            const: semtech,sx1509q
> +    then:
> +      patternProperties:
> +        '-cfg$':
> +          properties:
> +            pins:
> +              items:
> +                pattern: '^(oscio|gpio[0-15])$'

Sorry to be so late to reply, but don't these patterns only match "gpio0", "gpio1", and "gpio5"?

A quick search for some datasheets turned up the SX1503 and SX1509Q with 16 GPIOs, so I assume the
intention was to match "gpio0" to "gpio15". I think this should be "^(gpio[0-9]|gpio1[0-5])$" (or
something equivalent).

Best,
Sander