Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: f_hid: Conduct proper refcounting on shared f_hidg pointer

From: Lee Jones
Date: Thu Nov 17 2022 - 08:26:34 EST


On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Greg KH wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:08:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > A reference to struct f_hidg is shared with this driver's associated
> > character device handling component without provision for life-time
> > handling. In some circumstances, this can lead to unwanted
> > behaviour depending on the order in which things are torn down.
> >
> > Utilise, the reference counting functionality already provided by the
> > implanted character device structure to ensure the struct f_hidg's
> > memory is only freed once the character device handling has finished
> > with it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
>
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
>
> - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
> did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
> Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
> kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
> here to properly describe this.
>
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h's patch email bot

This is a completely new solution to the same problem.

I'm treating this as a brand new submission.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]