Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: imx: imxrt1050: add IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF_PIX clock gate

From: Giulio Benetti
Date: Wed Nov 16 2022 - 15:27:38 EST


Hi Jesse,

On 15/11/22 21:43, Jesse Taube wrote:


On 11/15/22 14:32, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Cc: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V1->V2:
* nothing done
---
  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c
index 26108e9f7e67..39f77c03b892 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static int imxrt1050_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
      hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_USDHC2] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("usdhc2", "usdhc2_podf", ccm_base + 0x80, 4);
      hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_LPUART1] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("lpuart1", "lpuart_podf", ccm_base + 0x7c, 24);
      hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF_APB] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("lcdif", "lcdif_podf", ccm_base + 0x70, 28);
+    hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF_PIX] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("lcdif_pix", "lcdif", ccm_base + 0x74, 10);
I think it makes sense to squash this with PATCH1 because it changes the same file. It also will make the change more understandable as I swapped the offsets for PIX clock and APB clock accidentally.

I would not squash them since on "Patch 1/4" fixes something, while
"Patch 2/4" adds something.

I'm not sure if this is necessary but I think there should be a commit description.

You're right and same goes for all patches, I keep forgetting.

Sorry for the noise.

Thank you
Best regards
--
Giulio Benetti
CEO/CTO@Benetti Engineering sas

Otherwise
Acked-by: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Jesse Taube
      hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_DMA] = imx_clk_hw_gate("dma", "ipg", ccm_base + 0x7C, 6);
      hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_DMA_MUX] = imx_clk_hw_gate("dmamux0", "ipg", ccm_base + 0x7C, 7);
      imx_check_clk_hws(hws, IMXRT1050_CLK_END);