RE: IRQ affinity problem from virtio_blk

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Nov 16 2022 - 06:10:06 EST

Next message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH] sched: consider WF_SYNC to find idle siblings"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH] EDAC/edac_module: order edac_init() before ghes_edac_register()"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "RE: IRQ affinity problem from virtio_blk"
Next in thread: Angus Chen: "RE: IRQ affinity problem from virtio_blk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Nov 16 2022 at 01:02, Angus Chen wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:24:24AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Any other information I need to provide,pls tell me.

A sensible use case for 180+ virtio block devices in a single guest.

Thanks,

tglx

Next message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH] sched: consider WF_SYNC to find idle siblings"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH] EDAC/edac_module: order edac_init() before ghes_edac_register()"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "RE: IRQ affinity problem from virtio_blk"
Next in thread: Angus Chen: "RE: IRQ affinity problem from virtio_blk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]