Re: [PATCH] lag_conf: Added pointer

[Yinjun Zhang]

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:56:37 +0300, Denis Arefev wrote:
> <...>
> @@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static void nfp_fl_lag_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  		acti_netdevs = kmalloc_array(entry->slave_cnt,
>  					     sizeof(*acti_netdevs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!acti_netdevs)
> +		 break;

I think we need give other entries and this entry itself one more chance by:
```
if (!acti_netdevs) {
	schedule_delayed_work(&lag->work, NFP_FL_LAG_DELAY);
	continue:
}
```

>  
>  		/* Include sanity check in the loop. It may be that a bond has
>  		 * changed between processing the last notification and the